InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dadd

08/22/08 12:30 PM

#137753 RE: midtieroil #137751

I guess you are saying that Sinopec, Anadarko, Addax, Chevron, and others never thought they could make any money in these blocks because of any taxes?

Yeah right - Good Point. LOL

Dadd
icon url

RKT989

08/22/08 12:34 PM

#137754 RE: midtieroil #137751

your wayyy off the oil is worth at PRODUCTION market prices .NOT RESERVE PRICING.Plug in 100 dollar per barrel into your model..

Looks a little better now HMMM..LOL
icon url

Gremlin9999

08/22/08 2:45 PM

#137773 RE: midtieroil #137751

midtieroil-You still haven't given us your estimate of what you think ERHC's share price will be worth.
icon url

tryoty

08/22/08 4:34 PM

#137804 RE: midtieroil #137751

midtieroil,

"All I am saying is that on an economic basis that the net reserves available to the partners is 7 billion because 50% is going to taxes. The partners will get revenues equivalent to 7 billion bbls of oil and that 7 billion bbls will not be encumbered by any more taxes."

The total reserves booked in your example would be 14B barrels. As the oil flows and is sold, 50% is paid as tax to the landowner leasing the blocks. It is an operating cost to the company and does not affect reserves. Again, you are arguing with data that affect net profit, not bookable reserves.

ERHC will be valued on its reserves long before any oil flows, and that recent $24 per barrel valuation is a bigger number than anything I've seen before. I suspect ultra deepwater reserves will be less than that, but even at $10 a barrel it puts ERHE in the $15 range if blocks 2, 3, and 4 contain 5B barrels as expected.


Did you know? You can ignore a poster by clicking their name, then ignore poster. To hide replies to ignored people click Tools->My Ignores and set Replies to ignored people to Hidden.