Replies to post #12905 on CruiseCam International, Inc. (fka fka CCMC)

[ThePennyTrader]

I won't offer because we simply do not know who it may be, only who it will not be, from the CEO's mouth himself. What good does it do to talk about DA when it won't be the company anyway.

[Ben Carn]

Cable, the fact remains that it could be anyone. Speculating is a complete waste of time. I agree that even though someone from the company denied certain info, but it could still be possible. Regardless, it means absolutely nothing at this point to speculate. Let me ask you this....If is it who you suspect, so what? What does this mean to you at this point? Do you just want to be right about it or do you have an idea bouncing around in your head as to the outcome of it being who you think it is? If you want to be right, then ok....I agree with you. It MUST be who you are thinking it is.

[lionsfan55]

Here is the message. On one hand people are upset with the messanger and on the other will except this as the truth. Viewer discretion advised. LOL

Posted by: Xilo Date: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:47:21 PM
In reply to: None Post # of 12909

Okay all, I got a response from Mr. Watkins the CEO of CCMJ on whether Drivers Alert is involved in the reverse merger. I'll let you read for yourself. I got some advice before posting this and appreciate all the help. I know there has been alot of speculation on the part of some that DA was involved.

Flag this messageRE: Hello again Mr. WatkinsWednesday, August 6, 2008 11:45 AM
From: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>View contact details To: Driver's Alert is not part of our discussions and please watch for our
releases.


Original Message:
-----------------
From: yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 08:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Hello again Mr. Watkins



Hello again Mr. Watkins. I contacted Drivers Alert and received a response
to the question of whether they restarted negotiations with CruiseCam or
not. How should I say this, it was an interesting response considering if
they were not part of the negotiations then there would be no cause to
answer the question with a no. I understand that it is not an admission
either and that is why I am writting to you at this time. Has CruiseCam
restarted the reverse merger process with D A? In answering this, I
understand that there are insider info issues and I am not asking for you
to do something unethical. A simple denial like before will suffice.

Thank you again,