InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

glaszman

08/19/08 11:07 AM

#112320 RE: 2late #112319

again, you have made an astute observation 2late....
icon url

mastaflash

08/19/08 11:50 AM

#112322 RE: 2late #112319

You just made me feel all goosebumbly ;)
icon url

727

08/19/08 12:14 PM

#112324 RE: 2late #112319

2late: Thanks a lot.
icon url

ditch72

08/19/08 12:21 PM

#112325 RE: 2late #112319

Interesting post, 2late, thanks.
icon url

ohbull2000

08/19/08 12:25 PM

#112327 RE: 2late #112319

Painted themselves into a bit of a corner...

didn't they?he-he-he I wouldn't worry too much about the need for a divy to force what needs to be done here, if the arrangements have been agreed to the "gods" will mandate, down the line, that shares have to be covered (400-500mil.)and the threat of re-shorting will be a exercise in financial suicide, at least for the first 30 days.

I like your legal points, after all... right is right... and in this amazing soap opera we seem to be back to where we should have been so long ago.

Good post.
icon url

harbecu

08/19/08 12:32 PM

#112329 RE: 2late #112319

Ok, where do you hear this? "possible cancel of the proposed R/S"

Would be nice.
icon url

MONEYMADE

08/19/08 10:38 PM

#112397 RE: 2late #112319

A+


MONEYMADE Talent on loan from God!

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=293
icon url

rope/a/dope

08/20/08 12:45 AM

#112399 RE: 2late #112319

2late; you are so right. but if tm does not issue a divy
to get things out there then the dtc can/will hold
us up as long as they want. the sec can't do a thing
about it.