sbb
I don't think anyone including all the longs who post on this board think for a moment that "naked shorting" is an excuse for the current share price of .004. The longs are well aware of the reasons, however, nake shorting is a contributor. It seems like everyone "including you" agrees with that, the difference is whether ONEV is at least aware that their current investors have been shorting shares. Quite frankly, Ugo has continually posted the failed to deliver lists which cannot be ignored. I will be the first to admit that I don't have enough experience and intimate knowledge to offer an opinion that would mean squat. However, where there is smoke there is fire. The questions that looms are whether ONEV knows about the naked shorting and failed to deliver and at worse have done nothing about it.
Certainly, you mention and we all know revenues are all that matter and all that ever mattered. If ONEV delivers on the contracts covered in the CC, within a relatively short time period all this talk of shorting shares and fail to deliver will be noise from the past. Unfortunately, this dialogue continues and I for one am tired of reading about it.
gannent