InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

fuagf

08/01/08 11:15 AM

#343665 RE: samaelrocks #343658

.. thanks, didn't realize the end was so close.. i didn't
read the argument, just thought you contradicted yourself ..

we know the situation is that your man would take allow a state
to refuse a women an abortion under conditions which she might
have one now .. he would be happy with a state refusal ..

.. semantically speaking, you are right he wouldn't personally refuse it, ..

.. no i didn't miss the point on purpose, why would anyone except to be tricky ..






icon url

sortagreen

08/01/08 11:29 AM

#343666 RE: samaelrocks #343658

How do you feel about the federal gummint dictating that these negros be allowed to vote and even to eat in the same restaurants as you? Why aren't states allowed to decide that for themselves as you feel the Constitution says?