InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

valinv2

07/17/08 4:36 PM

#1144 RE: cgraut #1133

cgraut, I owe you an apology

I was readng your original post too fast and thought you said you thought the 2nd qtr numbers would be "way below", and not "will be below" - chalk it up to anger at the share price and agitation from a certain "ringing" poster

I have been following this stock for 16 months and suddenly he thinks he can just bop in here and post about this company like he knows it all - he knows Squadouche about this company, and probably alot more about who has been selling and shorting it, imo

As far as Qtr 2 revs go, some folks are suggesting that we could be in for a pleasant surprise, but i will believe it only when i see a PR about it

I am willing to accept Melissa's Qtr 2 projection if she PR's it, if only because her last two projections, as ballparked to someone i know in january and as stated in a PR in May have been affirmed as true and accurate within a small order of error

I stand by my asssessment that if they do anywhere CLOSE to their 1st qtr revs in the 2nd qtr that it will be a sign that the company is still growing on track with their recent assessments

We MUST consider points like that when discussing a company that faces seasonal and cyclical revenue issues or we are probably not being honest and objective about their results

IMHO

Val