InvestorsHub Logo

lazlotrade

07/15/08 2:35 PM

#6770 RE: deafchild #6767

would be great, but just doesn't seem consistent with past practice, and does not seem that bonanza would have the incentive to partner with pgpm (unless the pgpm principals are getting theirs in exchange for selling the s.h. down the river). if dilute enough to sh (reverse split, etc.), then the pgpm equity holders' interest could be even further minimized, and anything of value restricted to "managerial consideration". on the other hand, perhaps the true value behind the scenes will make us all happy in the long run, and this is what bonanza gets to see and do dd on - if bonanza is involved. it's just that i have been reading the nicely worded and optimistic pr for so long now without any actual fruition, that i have become even more of a cynic than normal on this one - perhaps rp has graduated to more subtle innuendo, and figured out how to better make the board invent the pump for him. hope i am wrong, cuz i continue to hold, and want this to turn out well for all of us - not being altruistic, admittedly selfish. arggh. what do you all think is the likelihood - really? thanks.

laz