Actually, I have to support Supra a bit here.
With start-ups and small companies trying to get their act together, companies that are still evolving from the big idea model to the commercial model, a serious part of DD involves evaluating whether the company achieves its milestones within the time frames that the company itself announces.
And of course if they are late, evaluation has to center on why. Has the necessary information for approval been provided to the peak certifying body? And is the matter out of the company's hands because of bureaucratic delays?
I can and do live with the above scenario (CTGI). But if the delays are the fault of the company, then not probing deeper as to the reasons is IMO nothing short of goofy.
I'm still trying to figure out why these delays have happened with ARSC.