InvestorsHub Logo

bleedingedge

07/08/08 2:45 PM

#145231 RE: jonesieatl #145230

Can you post the link?

BREACHER

07/08/08 2:48 PM

#145232 RE: jonesieatl #145230

I can't believe that this is rejecting all of our patent's. It looks like to me that all of the EFF'S claims were rejected. I would be dumbfounded if this is against NEOM and all of there patents have been rejected. Thanks for posting that jonsie, hopefully someone soon can clarify this.

GONEOM

07/08/08 2:50 PM

#145234 RE: jonesieatl #145230

Thanks for the post...hopefully the claims made by EFF got rejected..I would PRAY for that...

GONEOM

jonesieatl

07/08/08 3:23 PM

#145243 RE: jonesieatl #145230

I think the definitive answer is in ....

... this 78 page document , but I can't get it to display beyond Page 1, which I posted already.

http://portal.uspto.gov/external/PA_1_0_15H/view/BrowsePdfServlet?objectId=FIERELTUPPOPPY5&lang=DINO

Someone just emailed me after they WERE able to view that document, here is their take on it:

"The 78 page response states the claims are being rejected as they should of been anticipated by the Wellner patent 193 etc. This is not a denial of the EFFs claims, those claims were already accepted and the re-exam ordered."

FYI and FWIW

jonesie


Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964


"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"

JPetroInc

07/08/08 6:00 PM

#145283 RE: jonesieatl #145230

Its neither good nor bad

Its all part of the reexam process. The EFF filed a correct application and the PTO set aside the claims. As Yellowjacket has already somewhat stated, the process of revalidation now starts. NeoMedia will respond to the PTO within 60 days as allowed by law.