Replies to post #23443 on Good Life China Corporation (GLCC)

[Glutten]

Janice - thanks for the input - as i said, i know little to nothing of the shorting theory and therefore stay out of it. I thought it odd that no one had talked much about the posting (at that time at least).

I am curious about the buyins.net situation - will watch while keeping in mind your statement here.

[public_eye]

Why so much interest in this stock to discredit no shorts? Someone feelin the squeeze or reg D theory not working?

[public_eye]

BTW Audited companies and SEC reporting co can't do Reg D so there goes that theory.

[public_eye]

Where does it say "The company even adds that they're legal shorts"? I took that filing to mean THIS IS WHAT THE COMPANY CAN NOT ACCOUNT FOR = NAKED SHORTS. Thats why companies do filings to show evidence of a material event. You make it sound as if the company is saying look we know its short so its OK when in fact they are saying look ITS NAKED SHORT AND ITS NOT OK!!!! As a shareholder you should be concerned. I AM !

[public_eye]

So how come you omitted naming Volpe but you mention Ronk? Volpe was the mastermind after all. I mean, didn't those companies all cry naked short and on Raging Bull all the posts were saying Reg D Reg D 504 toxic financing etc. Seems to me this is deja vu here. Interesting indeed.