InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jonesieatl

06/25/08 12:18 PM

#4125 RE: leftybobcat #4124

Thanks lefty for that information

I thought you had looked into that , I just couldn't remember the outcome.

So we won't see actual Moffat production (unless TIV changes the status) other than as guesswork amongst total revenues ... same for PV wells. Hey, if revenues start screaming upwards 10-Q to 10-Q, that will be fine by everybody lol.

So, are we in the midst of a 'seachange' for TIV?

Or has TIV learned from past perhaps overexuberant Press Releases which were finally known to be , well, overexuberant lol, when the actual numbers finally came out ... thus best to keep the numbers from coming out? (The kinds of things which come to mind are implications of cookie-cutter Temblor wells producing large quantities like the test wells were initially said to be doing, a Martin-Severins(?) gas well which was shown to be a complete bust after initial PRs, billions of BBLs-of-oil-equivalent of calcium carbonate at Monarch which were sold for a paltry few million dollars ... etc.)

Hopefully the 'seachange' is at hand.

Time will tell.

I think your guesswork as to possible price action in the short term is valid.

JMO

jonesie, out for a while
icon url

Howardb41

06/25/08 1:16 PM

#4126 RE: leftybobcat #4124


From: Howard Bleicher [mailto:howardb4@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 6:59 AM
To: Lynn Blystone
Subject: Oil & Gas Production


Lynn, in your pr where you stated: "having already attained a production rate in excess of 1,500 barrel of oil equivalent per day (BOED) on May 13"

How much of that 1500 BOEPD "on May 13" is sustained production and has that production continued to present day?

Regards,
Howard


REPLY TODAY
No comment at this time. A follow up press release should be coming shortly.