mingwan--
regarding your comment "This forum is not such a venue. It is for DNAP shareholders."
If this site is as great as you think it is (and I will be first to admit that I have seen worthwhile threads develop from time to time), then you should expect, and desire, that this forum be a venue for potential future shareholders of DNAP as well.
As such, it should contain open discussions about anything relevant to the future success of DNAP. This (fortunately imo) will include critical assessment of research goals as well as the evolving business plan and its execution. These types of discussion are the life blood of what makes a forum into a useful stop when researching a company for potential investment.
When someone like Mike Teirnan (sp?) comes along with posts of the quality I have read over the past couple of days and the primary response from the "board soldiers" (lol at THAT) is to speak about "agendas" and "oh just someone trying to get cheap shares," or "take that back to RootsWeb and leave us alone"...well, that tells anyone who visits here looking for information that this is just a little private community of pie-in-the-sky shareholders uninterested in anything more than sharing their collective dream. Is that the venue you are shooting for?
Just curious.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
