No, that wasn't my point for posting it, but you can make use of it for whatever point you want. Google also is not in a situation where every delay encountered means critical continued dilution for its stockholders, either, so I don't buy your point as it relates to ONEV's delays.
It is pretty comical to compare the delay, repeated delay, of the "one-and-only" potential for any significant revenue stream with delays on a product by companies that have hundreds or thousands of products.