It is kind of ironic the way I see cancer improvements. A search under clinical trials for cancer brings up Found 18466 studies with search of: cancer http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=cancer
This on one hand is staggering to say the least!
The oddity though is that there are so many individuals / companies all trying to improve cancer. It seems that everyone is out on their own trying to save the world for various reasons.
If Biocurex is for real (which I think they are) I would put them at the upper end of the food chain.
Why do I say this?
While we have some very smart doctors / scientists working on cancer, If you think about it, they have no clue as to why cancer begins or progresses. There are many types and many theories but nobody has been able to nail cancer. An interesting note, "Our oldest description of cancer (although the term cancer was not used) was discovered in Egypt and dates back to approximately 1600 B.C see the following following http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_6x_the_history_of_cancer_72.asp
IMO The best chance we have at this point is an early screening device. Biocurex is one of the few that picks up on "all cancers studied to date"
Once the doctor gets others to see it for themselves, it has got to catch on.
Doctor Moro has paced himself and IMO will continue until Recaf is acknowledged as THE EARLY SCREENING DEVICE.
Dr. Moro had the answer many years ago. He is just now getting the world to notice i.e through Abbott ISOBM, Inverness, Biosite etc.
He has mentioned many times in the past the word "patience" as I believe he knew from day one that this would not happen overnight. While we get frustrated that the stock price is low, Dr. Moro is more concerned about getting patents lined up in various parts of the world.
He did not go directly to CNN, he has waited until all of his ducks were in a row.
Dr. Moro's insight is tremendous and I believe he is now only months from letting the cat out of the bag.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
