InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

EZ2

06/22/08 9:43 AM

#17717 RE: timhyma #17706

Saudi Arabia Boosts Oil Production, Urges `Reasonable' Prices

By Ayesha Daya and Glen Carey

June 22 (Bloomberg) -- Saudi Arabia will increase its oil production by 200,000 barrels a day to 9.7 million next month and may pump more later this year if needed, Saudi Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi told producers and consumers in Jeddah today.

Naimi's comments to government and business leaders came after crude oil rose to a record $139.89 in New York on June 16. Saudi King Abdullah said his country, the world's biggest oil exporter, seeks ``reasonable'' prices.

The International Energy Agency estimates that world oil use this year will climb 800,000 barrels a day, or 1 percent, as demand increases in emerging markets. Stagnating production from Russia and the North Sea are also contributing to higher prices, which have touched off strikes, riots and accelerating inflation in nations around the world.

``Saudi Arabia is prepared and willing to produce additional barrels of crude above and beyond the 9.7 million barrels per day, which we plan to produce during the month of July, if demand for such quantities materializes and our customers tell us they are needed,'' Naimi said.

He said Saudi Arabia's capacity will be 12.5 million barrels a day by the end of 2009 and may rise to 15 million after that if necessary.

The President of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, Chakib Khelil, blamed $135 oil on speculative investors, the subprime credit crisis and geopolitics, rather than a shortage of supply. Khelil, who is also Algeria's oil minister, today dismissed the argument voiced by consuming nations that possible supply shortages are driving up prices.

Oil Supply

``The concern over future oil supply is not a new phenomenon,'' he told reporters in Jeddah.

More than 35 countries, seven international organizations and 25 oil companies were scheduled to take part in a summit which started at 1:30 p.m. local time and was being chaired by Saudi's King Abdullah. Kuwaiti oil minister Mohammed al-Olaim also called for greater regulation on oil market investors.

OPEC itself is divided. While Saudi Arabia is boosting output, other OPEC members including Libya, Algeria, Iran, Venezuela and Qatar are opposed to higher production.

Libya's top oil official, Shokri Ghanem, yesterday said his country may have to cut its own production in response to the Saudi move. Kuwait, OPEC's fourth largest producer, said it's ready to join neighboring Saudi Arabia and raise oil output if needed.

Record Crude

Oil rose to $139.89 a barrel on June 16 as investors bought commodities to hedge against a weakening U.S. dollar and concern mounted that demand is growing faster than supply. Gasoline retail prices over $4 a gallon in the U.S. are raising concern that the economy may slip into recession. Crude oil for July delivery closed June 20 in New York at $134.62 a barrel.

``Since joining OPEC, the kingdom of Saudi Arabia has been seeking a reasonable price, one that wouldn't harm the producers or the consumers,'' King Abdullah said in his speech.

On arrival in Jeddah last night, U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman rejected calls to put greater control on markets, and said a shortage of supply was responsible for pushing oil prices higher. He disputed the view that speculators are leading the markets to record levels.

The market needs between 3 million and 4 million barrels a day of spare oil production capacity, compared with the 2 million barrels a day currently available, Bodman said. OPEC says the world's spare capacity is 3 million barrels a day, with two-thirds of that in Saudi Arabia.

Supply Increase

Italy's Minister of Industry Claudio Scajola and Brazil's Energy Minister Edison Lobao said on arrival in Jeddah today that an increase in oil supply was needed to ease prices. ``We expect Saudi Arabia to open the taps,'' Austrian Economy Minister Martin Bartenstein said in an interview two days ago. ``One third of inflation in the euro zone comes from energy and inflation is now of importance.''

Speaking in Jeddah today, the Austrian minister said: ``We would like to see more oil on the market. That is the only action I can think of that can discourage the speculators.''

Kuwait's al-Olaim said the oil exporters group has ample idle oil capacity to meet demand, blaming speculation and political unrest in production for the increase. OPEC president Khelil told reporters that Saudi Arabia's commitment to raise output next month by 2 percent to 9.7 million barrels a day won't help to lower oil prices.

To contact the reporters on this story: Ayesha Daya in Dubai adaya1@bloomberg.netMatthew Brown in Dubai at mbrown42@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: June 22, 2008 08:12 EDT
icon url

EZ2

06/22/08 10:02 AM

#17718 RE: timhyma #17706

this is a 'repost' from the MO board on IV ~~~ just adds some very interesting perspective on potential TAX IMPLICATIONS:
<< bolded comments are repost from MO board >>

Re: capital gains

b. Obama's statement that he's not going to increase taxes on those who make under $250k *IS BOGUS ON ITS FACE*.

I am no Obama fan, but this is overstating things. As the tax code can be completely manipulated (as seen over and over again), Obama could get a bill passed that did not raise any taxes on people making less than $250K, by keeping the capital gains and dividend rates fixed where they are today for people making less than that and only raising them for incomes higher than that. Same with all the other taxes like AMT, dividends, etc. We already have 'progressive' taxation rates on regular income and capital gains and there is no reason they couldn't extended further. I agree that such a bill is unlikely, with the much more likely scenario being a bait and switch like Clinton's campaign promise of a middle class tax cut which we suddenly 'couldn't afford' once Clinton got into office.


I agree that its entirely *possible* for Obama to create a tax code that increases taxes but not on anyone making less than $250,000.

The problem is that the tax change that Obama is actually proposing doesn't do that! The fact is MOST Americans earn under $250k, large percentages of them own stocks, and of that group many of them will be paying more taxes under Obama's plan.

You *might* not pay higher taxes under an Obama administration if you don't ever sell stocks or earn dividends, but for just about *EVERYONE* on this board (who presumeably own MO or PM shares) you're going to be paying more taxes under an Obama administration, even if you earn less than $250k!

In short, his claim about proposed tax increases not affecting anyone with incomes under $250k is false. Even he wants to eliminate the cap on payroll (social security) tax on people who earn more than $200k.


c. If you want to "mark to market" and pay your capital gains taxes, I believe you can do that anytime you like without having to actually sell anything.

For everyone else who reports their capital gains and losses on a Schedule D, the only option to trigger a gain would be to execute a sell and then buy the shares back. Note: there are some exceptions with foreign passive income, hedges, and other types of property; but not with just regular stocks and equities.


OK, I stand corrected.


d. Even if Obama were elected, you stil don't have to sell anything! Just hold your MO for four more years and wait until the next administration, which might turn things around and reduce taxes again.

I'm gonna make a long term investor out of you yet. ;)

I'm already a long term investor. . .just that not ALL my investments are long term.

Any way you slice it, though, an increase in dividend taxes from 15% to as high as 40% is a major tax increase for "regular" buy-and-hold type investors. If I were a "widow and orphan" type investor who was depending on dividends for some or all of my income, I would be scared witless of an Obama administration.




.







REQUIEM
Horst Fass / Tim Page
icon url

EZ2

06/22/08 4:15 PM

#17719 RE: timhyma #17706

Record corn prices mean more expensive meat, dairy

Jun 22, 4:05 PM (ET)
By STEVENSON JACOBS

(AP) A police line surrounds the flooded south side of town Saturday, June 21, 2008 in Foley, Mo. Amid...
Full Image

NEW YORK (AP) - Raging Midwest floodwaters that swallowed crops and sent corn and soybean prices soaring are about to give consumers more grief at the grocery store.

In the latest bout of food inflation, beef, pork, poultry and even eggs, cheese and milk are expected to get more expensive as livestock owners go out of business or are forced to slaughter more cattle, hogs, turkeys and chickens to cope with rocketing costs for corn-based animal feed.

The floods engulfed an estimated 2 million or more acres of corn and soybean fields in Iowa, Indiana, Illinois and other key growing states, sending world grain prices skyward on fears of a substantially smaller corn crop. The government will give a partial idea of how many corn acres were lost before the end of the month, but experts say the trickle-down effect could be more dramatic later this year, affecting everything from Thanksgiving turkeys to Christmas hams.

Rod Brenneman, president and chief executive of Seaboard Foods, a pork supplier in Sawnee Mission, Kan. that produces 4 million hogs a year, said high corn costs were already forcing producers in his industry to cut back on the number of animals they raise.


(AP) East St. Louis fire chief William Fennoy stands near where the flood wall meets the dirt levee...
Full Image


"There's definitely liquidation of livestock happening," and that will cause meat prices to rise later this year and into 2009, said Brenneman, who is also the vice chairman of the American Meat Institute.

Brenneman's cost for feeding a single hog has shot up $30 in the past year because of record-high prices for corn and soybeans, the main ingredients in animal feed. Passing that increase on to consumers would tack an extra 15 cents per pound onto a pork chop.

It's a similar story for U.S. beef producers, who now spend a whopping 60-70 percent of their production costs on animal feed and are seeing that number rise daily as corn prices hover near an unprecedented $8 a bushel, up from about $4 a year ago.

"This is not sustainable. The cattle industry is going to have to get smaller," said James Herring, president and CEO of Amarillo, Tex.-based Friona Industries, which buys 20 million bushels of corn each year to feed 550,000 cattle.

Corn's prices were already rising before the floods, driven up 80 percent over the past year as developing countries like China and India scramble for grains to feed people and livestock. U.S. production of ethanol, an alternative fuel that can be made with corn, has also pushed prices higher, prompting livestock owners to lobby Washington to roll back ethanol mandates.

Before the floods, corn farmers were enjoying record profits selling the grain to feed animals and for use in cereals and as a sweetener in soda and candy. But a sharply smaller corn crop could wipe out those gains.

In Iowa, the No. 1 U.S. corn grower, floods inundated about 9 percent of corn crops, representing about 1.2 million acres - almost 1.5 percent of the country's anticipated harvest.

In Indiana, another 9 percent of corn and soybean crops were flooded, potentially costing farmers up to $840 million in lost earnings, Indiana Agriculture Director Andy Miller said.

Floodwaters also tossed farm equipment, sprayed cornfields with debris and silt and sucked away large chunks of topsoil. For livestock owners and meat producers, the damage may be felt long after the corn grows back.

Even before the floods, Tyson Foods was complaining that high grain prices would drive up its costs by $600 million this year. The world's largest poultry company has already raised its prices over the past year, and expects to keep raising them, CEO Dick Bond told analysts at a conference in May.

Higher feed prices will eventually filter through to the cost of milk, cheese and yogurt, too, since 65 to 75 percent of a dairy farmers' production costs are for feed, said Chris Galen, a spokesman for the National Milk Producers Federation.

With the cost of animal feed only going higher, many poultry and dairy farmers are starting to look for cheaper alternatives.

Nebraska dairy farmer Dan Rice, who has 1,500 cows, said one alternative is to buy some of the byproducts of cereal or flour production, but they're not nearly as productive compared to corn.

"If we all feed less corn and get less production, then the price at the grocery stores are going to go up," said Rice, who supplies milk to grocery stores in Omaha and around Kansas City.

Without easy ways to cut costs, many livestock producers will have little choice but to slaughter more animals and send them to market.

"We're in survival mode now," said Paul Hill, chairman of West Liberty Foods, a turkey processor based in West Liberty, Iowa. He estimated U.S. turkey producers will reduce their flocks by 10 to 15 percent nationwide, a cutback that will send consumer prices dramatically higher.

"The cost of Thanksgiving and Christmas turkeys will go up this year, and maybe even more next year," said Hill, who is also the chairman of the National Turkey Federation.

If corn were to rise to $10 a bushel, Richard Lobb, spokesman for the National Chicken Council, said recouping costs through higher retail prices may not be possible.

"Can you possibly charge enough for the chicken to recoup that investment?" he said. "That's a question no one can answer yet because it's never been done."

---

Associated Press writers David Mercer in Champaign, Ill., and Lauren Shepherd in New York contributed to this