Replies to post #14943 on T/A ETF AND INDEX

[JLS]

I did not say you said it was a conspiracy.

That is your inference. You infer an awful lot also.

I started my message with two questions regarding what you were saying. It wasn't clear. Therefore, the questions.

Didn't you see my question marks at the end of the two sentences? They looked just like the one in this paragraph.

I asked the questions because the context of my message (to which you responded) was conspiracies. You responded to that message and did not make it clear that you were changing the context. Was I to assume you were changing the context? It isn't good communication practice to change context in a back-and-forth dialog without making the change clear.

It is very common -- I would say even normal -- that the "least little thing" can cause the herd to react. That calls into question the value of all technical analysis, and it has nothing to do with probability because there is no way of calculating the probability of unpredictable events.