InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Alibi

06/19/08 9:56 PM

#24866 RE: venomen2002 #24864

veno, I wish I could be as eloquent as you are in fending off the nay-sayers. I don't have the expertise or the market-speak to jump in and avoid being roadkill. I will say, however, that I believe ONEV is everything we think it is and I am in it for the long haul. IMHO GLTA alibi
icon url

ihubposter

06/19/08 10:26 PM

#24870 RE: venomen2002 #24864

You may "happen to know a lot more about RCC and why breakeven was predicted by the company and what changed," but Dean should share that information with EVERYONE, not just his favorite shareholder to whom he gives ONEV's tech for free. That's AJIMHO!




icon url

skydoyle

06/19/08 10:38 PM

#24873 RE: venomen2002 #24864

unfortunately, those 2 moves won't do jack for the PPS/dilution.

First off what everyone seems to be missing here is the credibility of Onev's product (which is why they can't sell it).

Secondly, they are basically starting from scratch to revamp/improve the product. Which means they know about issue #1 and will go into a development cycle again.

So assuming they are going to hire more people the timeframe it will take to get them aboard, make the product useful, and bring in revenues is probably 2010.

in the meantime, the PPS and dilution will continue to take it in the shorts affecting current shareholders.