Replies to post #24855 on One Voice Technologies, Inc. (fka OVOE)

[ihubposter]

I am in this conversation because I am a poster on this board, and my posting is not dictated by the topics on which you wish me to post. I disagree with your assertion that the filing of something in an SEC document makes it VERIFIABLE. If that were the case, we would have hit breakeven in Q1 '06; instead, we still haven't come close. In that scenario (the aforementioned breakeven one) NO ONE would have have been able to provide a "verifiable" link disputing the allegedly "verifiable" SEC link on breakeven, because RCC wasn't speaking about the fact that they were not launching with ONEV, despite ONEV's "verifiable" statements to the contrary.

Don't be cross just because someone disagrees with you, veno; it's unbecoming of you, IMO.

[sburlria]

because
gawd forbid he is seeing if you will ever admit that the company has hyped contracts forever with little to show for it. So many PRs have been proven 100% false, and most people understand that a leopard doesn't change its spots. I would even venture that if onev says it, more often than not it won't happen.
Some real DD would be finding the % of PRs that were either completely false or had no bearing on revenue. We could then determine the degree of confidence to have in anything onev or cervelle says. My charitable guess is 1 in 4, or a 25% chance that what onev says is true or will ultimately happen.