I am in this conversation because I am a poster on this board, and my posting is not dictated by the topics on which you wish me to post. I disagree with your assertion that the filing of something in an SEC document makes it VERIFIABLE. If that were the case, we would have hit breakeven in Q1 '06; instead, we still haven't come close. In that scenario (the aforementioned breakeven one) NO ONE would have have been able to provide a "verifiable" link disputing the allegedly "verifiable" SEC link on breakeven, because RCC wasn't speaking about the fact that they were not launching with ONEV, despite ONEV's "verifiable" statements to the contrary.
Don't be cross just because someone disagrees with you, veno; it's unbecoming of you, IMO.