That line of reasoning would make little sense at all with ONEV. Why would market makers need to "shake" weak hands of their One Voice shares with another 200M+ due to dump into the market from toxic funders between now and September 2008? A more logical scenario would be that they DO have some news. BAD news passed along to them from the toxic funders and the MMs are dumping shares at their request on large block bids striking break even.
As was correctly pointed out, this is an indication of unusually nervous and unorderly selling, not some form of clandestine market maker disipline to accumulate shares. It would seem that for every logical conclusion brought to this board to explain a pattern of behavior well established by ONEV over an eight year history, there is never a shortage of just as many illogical conclusions presented to explain or excuse those obvious patterns of behavior away. Sometimes shares trade or dip down just because of the simple realization that they are rapidly going to become worth a lot less in the near future.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
