InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

opportunityknocking

06/13/08 10:20 AM

#14287 RE: Kag #14286

I appreciate everyone's perspective with few exceptions (Zolax). When I have been upset in the past I didn't hold back, but I think we really have turned the corner. I can actually see the finish line. I apologize if I seem as if I am overexcited, but I see us as a real company and we will have meaningful earnings. No one seems to dispute the technology and I want to remind everyone here we are all invested for the same reason. We hold patents to a valuable link in diagnosing ALL TYPES of cancer and IMO will lead us to a link towards a cure. I have more faith in the technology by how fast we have come with the development of Recaf. Dr Moro has proven to me (I am speaking for myself) that he truly understands how to locate all cancer cells on a molecular level. It is difficult for the lay person to wrap their brain around such an accomplishment. I have turned positive when he said now it is time to let anyone at any level in science to test for themselves the level of sensitivity and specificity on ANY cancer for themselves. That is reassuring to me and my investment.


icon url

Ted F

06/13/08 11:30 AM

#14292 RE: Kag #14286

Kag, thanks for the compliment, but I wouldn't call myself a savvy investor but rather an investor who has been burned enough times to have learned to watch for firetrucks.

As far as yesterday's press release, I will leave the board with these questions to answer:

If ABT, who has a market cap of over $80 billion dollars, didn't want to spend/risk money on getting approval for their test, do you believe that clinical labs will individually fork over money to do so?

If you were the head of one of these labs wouldn't you ask Dr. Moro to get the test approved first and then to come back once he does?

If you answered no to these two questions, then you should ask yourself 2 other questions:

1)Does Dr. Moro truly believe that he can convince these labs to do so?

2)If he doesn't truly believe these labs will buy into his proposition, why put out such a press release?



icon url

mysscat

06/13/08 12:11 PM

#14298 RE: Kag #14286

KAG: AS I recall from a while ago you have been fairly negative on the stock. You said that you were selling your stock to be a moderator of this board. Then at some point you said you still owned stock. I believe that you are one of those folks who are on the negative side of the fence. Therefore, it's logical for you to agree with Ted. However calling him a "savvy investor" is ludicrious.