Replies to post #1593 on A.I.M. Users Bulletin Board (AIMUSERS)

[Conrad]

Cowboy,

I understood what your were doing except that your explanations made it not clear as to what you wanted to achieve...it was a discussion on a better name for the PC, not specifically on what was happening.

Besides that, when you talked about the shift of the Neutral Point it appeared to me that what you were talking about was the translation of the Neutral Point that occurs when you use {PC-SC*S} as a Buy Order as a transformation from the Buy Advice. That is a shift of the Neutral Point so that the your PC is no longer your Neutral Point. That is the inevitable conclusion of what is happening, and this has nothing to do with the shift of the PC after a Buy or a Sell have been processed. To me this shift is actually the most interesting thing, as it point out a fundamental difference between the tow AIM-forms! I believed that this was why you discussed it as well.

What is very clear is that what happens to he Neutral Point before the Buy/Sell Action is a completely different topic
than the mechanism for updating the PC after the Buy/Sell.

So, we both know what we are doing, and why we do it. The discussions on PC/N or PC/(1+s) is simply les relevant in this because it is simply an way of defining a point. In the Vortex AIM similar calculations are also made, but they do not form part of the explanation.

These discussions prove all the more that we need to transmit pictures in order to eliminate thousands of words. But more important is that in these discussions all of us tend to be far too informal and mix up various different words that mean the same thing, or we use words that have two or three meanings.

Thanks, anyway, for your efforts to make me see your light!

Conrad