Also I would like to point out important dates that I think
have some merit and a connection in some way.
March 24, 2008--Unusally high volume
March 26, 2008-PR annoucement
April 3, 2008-More stock issued thru Sec of State of Nevada
diluting existing shareholders.
April 3-5th-2008- Everyone asking
where did all this stock come from. Call PR
and said they did not know. High Volume.
April 14,2008-Sec paper filed. About a week later the cat is out of the bag.
I am out of the country now but will tally up the shares on
a daily basis when I get back. If you read the FD from SEC,
I think a material thing happened where shareholders should have been informed prior to the new issue of stock that they
were going to be diluted by 4-6 times. That is a very substantial dilution without a word. Other shareholders
new of the dilution by the act itself. The the large volume
followed. Now you see with about 300 million shares traded,
the stock is in no better shape then before. If the stock
was not diluted we would be well over a peeny or two with
the news that has come out since then. The question one has to ask is would that news have come out if they didn't increase the float and was that done by design. Also such
a material change in my opionion violates the FD from the
SEC. These are some of many questions that will be asked
at later dates. All I want as I am sure all shareholders
want is a fair shake and from what I have observed, selective
info has been given out or concealed by virtue of the 504 or
whatever instrument they used to increase shares. I have always
asked about the float with no one in IR giving out any info,
saying they weren't sure what it was. The other question is in
March of 07 did the CEO have the right or the authority and
have a majority of shares to vote, as he didn't call for a vote to give himself the Series A Preferred and the non dilutable
30,000,000 shares plus other stock for others for forgiveness
of debts.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
