First of all, that's not negative -1,000% since the most a stock can be down is -100%. 2nd, there's a variety of logical reasons why the stock went down. Just because the stock went down doesn't mean the "information" some ass clown posted that was entirely false, incorrect, and misleading is somehow any more magically correct.
In short, certain fools were stupid and lucky. UWKI's problems had nothing to do with many of the reasons in this so-called "negative information."
There's plenty of other reasons the stock went down such as the stock price ran wild because of the media blitz (outlined beautifully here by so many longs at the time such as myself that made a massive profit from it). Nolan being on CNBC a few times probably peaked it -- what better exposure could they hope for after that? And shortly after this huge media blitz ended suddenly there was massive profit to be taken on the table and people took their massive profit and the stock sold off as 2007 didn't get the market excited again as little was accomplished nor took place as far as the market is aware.
In short, in my book you only get credit for calling a stock's move if it actually moves for the reasons you cited. Credibility is EARNED.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
