InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jakedogman1

05/27/08 6:45 PM

#23710 RE: keep_trying #23709

For the last two years or so, someone or some entity or a group have controlled the price. They seem to be in the "know" and have been connected to financing. IMO, the bougus pr for the russell last year was a charade and IMO mgmt knows it. My guess is accumulation by way of hedge funds or other offshore players. SEC rules don't matter cause the SEC is out of commission.
icon url

realist1

05/27/08 8:32 PM

#23719 RE: keep_trying #23709

RE "3 million share drop in short interest between April 15 and April 30, 2008 "

Explain how a net buying of 3 million shares didn't move the price up? My opinion remains that it was a closing of a short against the box, because 3 million shares of buying would move the price up don't you think?
icon url

jazzbeerman

05/27/08 9:29 PM

#23722 RE: keep_trying #23709

KT,

Whatever the reason, far fewer shares are actively betting against PPHM's stock moving up...

Also, IMHO, it means to me that nobody on the street believes in a PIPE coming soon.

If Peregrine were shopping, or even inquiring - even as discretely as possible (which is virtually impossible :) - for a private placement to raise money, wouldn't we be seeing a big jump in short shares? Especially with the PPS where it is - to raise enough money to avoid a "going concern" clause would take a lot of shares...

The current historically unprecedented low short percentage looks to me that there is no upcoming PIPE, and not even any rumor of a PIPE among the folks who should be hip to such things.

They're not betting on a PIPE.

Why?

j