ic45 I personally will try to help in the future with not setting up expectations that are not met. Maybe we are all a little guilty but in the end he report actually came across with the best of expectations and a little more from my perspective. However I have become aware that posters( sucha as myself) may post things that were not intended to create expectations that would not be met in any way shape or forrm. For my own comments that might of suggested things that were not going to be specifically posting in pending Pr's I will try harder not to be a fame fueler when this market is so geared to the " all or disappointment " perspective. I do understand the criticism and personally will try t keep my excitement about what may or may not ve documentable in pending PR's down to a very conservative approach as its certainly never been my intent to make comments the company would not support with the Pr's that follow. Thank ou for your thoughts about my Daughter and I am thrilled again to report at this time it looks as thought a full recovery will be attained. Sea
Ic45....First question is did you read the report?
Second question is How did the report not meet our(the board) high expectations? IMO after reading the report it exceeded my expectations. We indeed have double the Niobium along with rare earth minerals. We also have a very good chance of having Tantalum as theya re almost always found together.Not to mention a shot at uranium.
Third question is what were you expecting from the Hawk report that was not contained in the report?
I am not trying to be confrontational here but I have heard from several posters that they were not impressed by the Hawk report and I do not see their point of view.I feel that except for the share price, the boards expectations of the report have been on target and not at all "pie in the sky" hype.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
