I think it is wrong to shut down (or roast) every poster that comes along that has a negative comment to say.
All Howard said was that he thought it may be a good idea to have a reverse split in order to mitigate what may look like to a newbie as a Nigerian scam vis a vis a shareprice that is not in the pennies. We all know that institutions don't touch stocks in the pennies or with DOJ investigations. He is saying that he wants institutions to touch it, because they're the big buyers. He is also saying that he would like to float reduced. What's wrong with opining in this way?
No one wants a reverse split, imo opinion, it would be the kiss of death as it is for any penny stock. But if he wants to discuss it what's wrong with that?
If you TRULY don't care if newbies do not buy ERHE pre drilling results, then you shouldn't care about the stock rising pre-drilling result either, since it takes newbies for that to happen. So why should you care if someone talks a little negatively? See what I'm saying here?
Shutting down dissenters goes against my shiny "moral GPS system", lol (not to mention that it leads to group think).
And there is nothing gentle about a 2:1 r/s, imo.
Krombacher