InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Onefortypointsix

05/20/08 8:59 AM

#23244 RE: bulls9999 #23242

If that is how you want to spend your free time, that really shows what kind of person you are. I'd spend it with friends/family not going after a ceo in san diego to settle a gruge through message boards, but thats me.

Good luck getting even.
icon url

Cee-It

05/20/08 10:11 AM

#23253 RE: bulls9999 #23242

Oh, come on, it is the nature of the public stock market for the CEO to be overly optimistic about the outcome of events in the future. ONEV has no lock on that, it is an abbundant part of virtually every company's public relations with investors.

Also, I certainly do not find anything exceptionally positive in the statement that new investors will provide funding in exchange for restricted shares. Of course they will. Does anyone expect a private placement to NOT be restricted shares? Those new shares will be restricted only for a specified time. There is nothing to imply that the company would be able to, or want to, reduce the amount either... it is hoped the amount will reach the $1.5 million, but it obviously might be less.

Facts are facts. Too many are twisting meaningless facts into their own inventive drivel in order to emphasize either their positive (pumping) desires or their negative (derisive) naysayer nature. History is history, it corrects speculation. If you speculated two years ago that ONEV would be gone by the end of the year (and many did) you were wrong. If you speculated two years ago that ONEV would be worth 50 cents per share by now you were equally wrong.

Personally, I believe ONEV will be worth more than 15 cents per share by the end of December, but I'm fully prepared to be wrong and wait longer. I would cover any reasonable wager that they will still be in business this time next year, but I'd be fully prepared to be wrong. Any investor or speculator should always be fully prepared to be wrong. You should stop defending your investment when you stop believing it is sound, but that doesn't mean you need to attack everyone who still believes.

GLTA
icon url

skydoyle

05/20/08 10:34 AM

#23255 RE: bulls9999 #23242

Bulls, and I second that!!

Very nicely said.

Not to mention we'd all lose our azzz if we sold now anyway.
icon url

Ugo22

05/20/08 1:01 PM

#23274 RE: bulls9999 #23242

Can you try to supporting your arguments. This company started as a RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. Never at any time prior to 2006 had the CEO made Break Even comments about any contract or projects.

All filings completely stae the risk, financial data, etc....

Below is an example of new Big ONEV. Can help us all out and remind us of the even BIGGER Revenue Contract/Project that came before this one?

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1096088/000101968708002240/onevoice_10q-033108.txt

"In October 2007 both the Company and Mantec Consultants ("Mantec") entered into
a contract with Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ("MTNL") of India to provide
MobileVoice services to MTNL's over 6 million subscribers. Mantec is One Voice's
local sales associate in India. MTNL is owned and operated by the Government of
India. The Company and Mantec are currently working on deployment of hardware
and systems integration with MTNL. According to MTNL, the MobileVoice service
will be made available to MTNL's existing 6.13 million subscribers for
MobileVoice email by phone service and the total expected customers for this
service is .92 million within the first two years. MTNL has set the monthly
subscription price of $1.25 USD monthly per subscriber out of which the Company
has a 30% share. We anticipate the MTNL revenue stream to grow as we launch
additional MobileVoice services including voice dialing, group call and
voice-to-SMS services. In order to expedite the launch with MTNL we decided to
initially launch email by phone and the revenue projections given by the
marketing department of MTNL reflect the email by phone service only. We
anticipate this revenue projection to grow as additional MobileVoice services
are launched to MTNL subscribers. We are planning on having our service ready
for testing by MTNL by the end of May, 2008. MTNL will then have a 3 month
testing period after which revenue generation to the Company will commence. The
revenue generated from this launch with MTNL is expected to have a material
impact on the Company."