Oh, come on, it is the nature of the public stock market for the CEO to be overly optimistic about the outcome of events in the future. ONEV has no lock on that, it is an abbundant part of virtually every company's public relations with investors.
Also, I certainly do not find anything exceptionally positive in the statement that new investors will provide funding in exchange for restricted shares. Of course they will. Does anyone expect a private placement to NOT be restricted shares? Those new shares will be restricted only for a specified time. There is nothing to imply that the company would be able to, or want to, reduce the amount either... it is hoped the amount will reach the $1.5 million, but it obviously might be less.
Facts are facts. Too many are twisting meaningless facts into their own inventive drivel in order to emphasize either their positive (pumping) desires or their negative (derisive) naysayer nature. History is history, it corrects speculation. If you speculated two years ago that ONEV would be gone by the end of the year (and many did) you were wrong. If you speculated two years ago that ONEV would be worth 50 cents per share by now you were equally wrong.
Personally, I believe ONEV will be worth more than 15 cents per share by the end of December, but I'm fully prepared to be wrong and wait longer. I would cover any reasonable wager that they will still be in business this time next year, but I'd be fully prepared to be wrong. Any investor or speculator should always be fully prepared to be wrong. You should stop defending your investment when you stop believing it is sound, but that doesn't mean you need to attack everyone who still believes.
GLTA