Replies to post #106951 on Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

[RedneckInvestor]

They didn't sue her because she settled with them.

Yeah, without admitting anything. I guess this leaves her free & clear to romp & stomp through BCIT/Energy Source, straight into bankruptcy as she planned? And Why would she need them bankrupted if she weren't terribly short?

One last question, real important here... Who was the "we" in the famous "romp & stomp" threat?

[webmoney]

"Even Janice concedes that BCIT was majorly naked shorted to fill buy demand back when it was trading.."

So Janice in this statement that you made to Art back when, where you saying it was your opinion that BCIT was not NSS from the inside?

Posted by: Art2Gecko
In reply to: webmoney who wrote msg# 106933
Date:5/19/2008 3:18:21 PM
Post #of 106952

Well Art I have to admit I missed that fact. Can you please show me which Filing shows "invalid shares" which entered the marketplace via naked shorting to fill buying demand."

lol, then please explain how that many "invalid" shares entered the public marketplace... Even Janice concedes that BCIT was majorly naked shorted to fill buy demand back when it was trading..

[Art2Gecko]

I didn't say "because she claimed indigence" just that she wasn't included in the suit.

anywow, I would love to see Pammy's "Offer of Settlement" to the SEC... perhaps you could post a copy? I'd be surprised if She hadn't sent you a copy of it.