InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

WillyWizard

03/05/02 3:28 PM

#2435 RE: Bird of Prey #2434

bird,

What I was trying to accomplish?? Just passing on info that was very interesting to read. The source site was included in the post just not the live link. Nothing was altered or changed. I don't care who you thank because it was very interesting to see someone actually admit being paid to collect posts on a thread site.

Thank you,

Willy

Disclaimer: http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=284165 disclaimer is copied off my web site and should be read in conjunction with all my posting at IHUB.
icon url

NorthWesterner

03/05/02 3:53 PM

#2436 RE: Bird of Prey #2434

Well, the Tribune got one thing wrong. It wasn't $5,000, it was $20,000. JM says so, and of course he must be right.

___________________________________________________
Funny thing, but it seems that the harder I work, the luckier I get.
icon url

Mark Marcellus

03/05/02 4:03 PM

#2437 RE: Bird of Prey #2434

My only question is "$5k, for gathering posts?" I thought I had an easy gig!

Not as easy as it sounds. To do it, you would have to keep track of the Puggles many aliases. You would also have to know when he was the one using it, as opposed to loaning it out to one of his henchmen. Joe can call Janice a "paid basher" if he wants, but in this case "expert witness" would be more appropriate. Some academicians become specialists in rare tropical diseases. Through a series of rather bizarre circumstances, Janice instead became a specialist in Pugs.

icon url

Phil(Hot Rod Chevy)

03/05/02 8:01 PM

#2456 RE: Bird of Prey #2434

BOP,

Getting paid $5K for "gathering posts" is definitely not "getting paid for bashing" which is what "monkeyboy" was accusing Janet of.

He owes her an apology.

Have fun,
Phil