Boomer, which is more likely?
Potential investors see value in this stock, they see a news release about a new contract with Microsoft, but before they do anything else they turn to ihub, and decide not to invest
or
Buyers were here almost 3 to 1, but as all of us saw while watching level II again today, whenever the price started to move up it was met by selling and held down.
The last time you blamed it on daytraders selling after the webcast failed to mention Microsoft, even though a closer analysis shows the selling started before the webcast around 10:30 am, as soon as the price touched 10 cents. And the same type of level II action was present. You say the note is a good thing and a common thing when it is actually damaging. And you cannot find even 1 example of anything like it anywhere else. When will you acknowledge what is going on here, admit that the terms of the note are unheard of and a conflict of interest, and stop giving support and encouragement to Chutjian, whether purposely or unwittingly? He held our investment down for over a year by accomplishing nothing, and now that Dr. Chavis has some positive things going on, he is continuing to hurt us by manipulating the stock.
This is my opinion based on all that I have observed during my 2+ years as a shareholder. It is a sad commentary on the pink sheets in general and one individual in particular.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
