InvestorsHub Logo

greg s

04/22/04 5:18 PM

#234872 RE: Math Junkie #234869

re: I'm not saying it was a bad call, but he gave about a one week window ending on 4/22

Whaddya want for nothing??? A rrrrrubber biscuit??? (tm, The Blues Brothers)

I don't see you doing any better?

Zeev Hed

04/22/04 5:24 PM

#234874 RE: Math Junkie #234869

Don't be a lazy bum, bring up the quote so we can decide, you are too lazy here it is: from #msg-2749633,

say a first top there on April 14th plus minus two days, that is the first leg of the advance (about 200 Naz point from the low on March 24th). That is followed by a short furious retrench should be held in the general area of 1993 to 2007) lasting no more than a week (let say bottom on 4/22 same plus minus).", it was a week from the top, it was "fast and furious", so furious it overshot the target and ended on the center day 4/22 (so far), why complain when the turnips are right, you'll have enough occasions to complain about the poor vegies when they'll be wrong, and they are going to be wrong, I can assure you that....

Not only they called the move three weeks ahead of time (and actually, if you look at the 12/25 map, it is the same...), but in the last few days, when the despair in these parts was so thick you could cut it with a knife they were steadfast in their analysis and eventual vindication, despite the minor inraction today earlier. The bottom was actually on 4/20 at 1978, making sense since the top occurred a little ahed of schedule as well (the decline started 4/13, not 4/14..sorry for their erring ways...)