Boomer, I continue to be very positive on the company. I love the concept and have faith in the integrity and leadership of the CEO. I want the price to go higher and, as everyone knows, I believe someone continues to hold it back. I believe making everyone aware of the terms of the convertible note (you know, the one even you don't fully understand though you continue to defend it) and the obvious conflict of interest created by the chairman of the board when he granted it to himself, is critical to the future success of the company and our investment.
No conflict of my interests. I am fighting for what is right for the company and the shareholders, only a few of you can't open your minds enough to understand the situation.
Before you wrongly accuse me of having 2 opinions, you should try to understand a few things, like how the convertible note really works, like the fact that this type of deal made by the chairman for the chairman is NOT COMMON and is a conflict of interest, and that my questioning flsunchaser's change of opinion is absolutely not the pot calling the kettle black.
You know, just by the fact that you are the moderator here gives you a certain degree of credibility with anyone new who passes by. And while I know you own shares and desparately would like to see them back to at least break even, just like all the rest of us, I think you are doing everyone a disservice by not being objective about this company's chairman and his own personal agenda. Sometimes ignoring the negative won't make it go away.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
