actually saddam said he wanted to make a bomb and was starting as soon as he could, and that he did indeed have people working on bioweapons, and a lot more
>>>.....and refused to let UN inspectors in....... It doesn't matter you don't know what you are talking about anyway.<<<
Priceless. You tell me SH wouldn't let UN inspectors in and then tell me I don't know what I'm talking about.
March 17, 2003
"In the clearest sign yet that war with Iraq is imminent, the United States has advised U.N. weapons inspectors to begin pulling out of Baghdad, the U.N. nuclear agency chief said Monday."
In case the question isn't obvious.......if as you insist SH "wouldn't let UN inspectors in", why did Bush have to order UN inspectors to leave 3 days before he started the war?
If you had the faintest idea of the bigger picture surrounding this war you would ask this question instead: "Why didn't Bush allow UN inspectors to finish their mission"? Especially in light of the fact that all the "guaranteed" WMD sites turned out to be dry holes........a fact well known by Bush at the time he kicked them out.
And for the fourth time now: Iraq was seized by blunt military force and is now occupied by 75 US bases and 150,000 US troops in Iraqi territory. Why does this not qualify as an invasion?
Speaking of not knowing what one's talking about let me give you a little clue - Not only did Saddam let inspectors in we could have sent in thousands more but it was the punk that needed to invade Iraq who told them to leave as it was embarrassing that they couldn't find anything.
No wonder your posts make you look stupid - you are!