Max,
<<They would like to call your contact and find out what they are being investigated for.
>>
Maybe for having a vote without the legal notification to the investors and then illegally voting shares against the knowledge of those shareholders in the way the CEo wanted the vote to go.
If you talk to him, I'd like his ideas on that one.
I TOLD him that he could not do it that way, but he didn't seem to care.
I hope the SEC is not investigating that scenario, but it would be one of the areas I would guess they ARE. Just becuase it was so flagrant.
Can you get us a response from Wilf to that situation and why WIlf feels that he can vote shares of shareholders without notifying them of a vote and then not getting their reply?
Thanks Max. That one would clear a lot of things up for ME.
:-)