MBoomer, as I said in post #5153,
"Things like this can happen when small companies needing operating capital are forced into the worst types of financing arrangements."
The problem is this deal was arranged by the board, for the board, and then given to themselves, with a locked in price 50% lower than the lowest bid price. If the conversion is executed, it does nothing but guarantee themselves at least a 100% return, dilutes the holdings of all other shareholders, and has resulted in the current stock price of 6 cents. How is this in the best interest of the shareholders or the company? Can you honestly say you support this type of action by a board of directors? Can you even suggest that this type of arrangement does not violate the fiduciary duties of a board of directors of a publicly traded company?
I am still holding also, and am doing everything possible to prevent these 2 directors from giving themselves 20 or 30 million new shares because if it happens, I see no way that it can be a good thing for anyone except Chutjian and Freedman.