InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ssc

04/15/08 1:58 PM

#5118 RE: MBoomer17 #5117

You're doing it again. I didn't contradict myself, I quoted the SEC regulations that say even though a pink sheet company may not be required to file SEC reports, "Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, and other relevant SEC laws and regulations relating to illegal insider trading, pertain to any person and not to the type of securities (i.e., registered or not registered). Thus, our laws pertain to those who commit illegal insider trading in pink sheet companies." To put it simpler, even though not required to meet SEC reporting requirements, insiders ARE required to follow laws and regulations regarding insider trading. No contradiction there, IMO.

The first location has been open since 12/18/2007. That is almost 4 months, 1/3 of a year, which is more than 1/4, not just under a quarter.

What makes no sense to me is why shareholders would not demand more from a company. Opening 1 location in 3 years is why the stock is down, not anything posted on any message board.

On what do you base your statement that a second store could be open in 6 weeks?

icon url

Ymee

04/15/08 2:03 PM

#5119 RE: MBoomer17 #5117

Boomer- I assume you believe that both the BOD and Dr. Ben are monitoring this board. With the conditions of the sentiments being posted (such as accusations of insider trading) don't you think if they cared about their shareholders they would have Dr Ben call a conf. call. These are serious allegations and with trying to keep this board on the positive note we should be addressed. The negetivity here STINKS!!!