InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

greedy__malone

04/07/08 12:38 PM

#3345 RE: exoticbiker #3343

exotic

Sorry, just felt it was relevant that the reasonings used by josey to try and explain the dilution taking place here are the same excuses he used last year to make excuses for the dilution that resulted in a R/S.

Not sure why that wouldn't be relevant to current dilution trends but the similarities between his posts this year and his posts last year are definitely there and almost mirror each other. It's not an attack, just an observation.

If previous posts can't be referenced or reposted then why are they there? I assume he would be using those posts if what he said was actually true.

I'd like you to clarify what past posts are able to be used here and what posts are not. Those posts remain available on IHUB, there is no TOS violations in them and they are there to be referenced.

Are you saying it is not right for me to refer to those posts and repost them? If that's the case then you should delete them. I'm pretty certain that josey will gladly repost my posts if he ends up being right. That's fine with me. If I make a post it becomes a record. That record can be accessed by anybody and those posts can be reposted to show a pattern of successes or failures.

A posters past posts are a good indicator of that posters ability to accurately predict the future. Posters who are continually right and posters who are continually wrong have a posting history to go by. I believe people should take great care in what they say openly on a message board as those posts can be referenced and used to show a specific pattern.

I meant no harm in those posts, I was simply pointing out the fact that josey was blaming shorts, MM's and daytraders last year just prior to the R/S and he is blaming the same people for this years collapse of the pps. It was an observation, I made the comment and just to back up my opinion and my position I reposted some of josey's posts from last year. It was actually the right thing to do in the situation because I didn't simply accuse him of something without showing exactly what it was I was using to come to that conclusion.