Hemi has always maintained an opening communication with shareholders that inquire with specific and proper questions as they relate to the business operation over and above the channels of a PR.
The real issue is how that inquiry gets shared, communicated and I am sorry to say manipulated by some.
And IMO how that information or inquiry is shared to others then becomes the trigger point that makes "another shareholder angry" And believe me this HMGP general board has been down that road many times.
You are absolutely correct that contacting HMGP, or for that matter any company, with un-focus questions and accusations or an angry approach isn't good for anybody and this IMO only fosters additional mis-preceptions, anger and further negative speculation that feeds upon itself.
IMO any investor has the right to make an inquiry to the company and if that inquiry is proper and direct to the operation of the business the company needs to respond, and that IMO is what HMGP does. If that inquiry is off the beaten path or prior information from that party making that inquiry has been taken out of context, then IMO the company or in this case HMGP, should not spend another minute replying to that party. then is becomes wasted and unproductive time spent.
For those who contact Hemi with good inquiries then they deserve a reply and IMO that is exactly how HMGP has handle this issue of communication.
PR's are for material facts and company updates, direct communication is for additional questions by individuals to the company relative to an individuals interest or concerns as it directly relates one's interest in the company and can be answered or provided by the company within the proper information already publicly available or PR'ed.
Kels
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
