InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lasernat

03/04/08 1:35 PM

#3541 RE: Lex_Luthor #3539

Well said
icon url

TekNuLoof

03/04/08 1:38 PM

#3542 RE: Lex_Luthor #3539

Huhhh? You mean to tell me that spewing pumps all over the boards without any basis and then claiming that a company is transparant based on the fact that it is still trading is an educated opinion.

Tell me what are we investing in? I know about EV Parts, but what about the rest of the story. The PR said it would share financial info, business plan and share structure on Friday night. Don't ya think maybe that should be information that should be out there already while trying to get investors into your stock if you are a legit company???

Oh that's right, it doesn't matter cause all the big MOMO boys are out there right now sayin dizz onezz izzzz cheappppp!!! LOADZZ UPZZZZ NOWZZZ!!! Buyzzzzzzzz nowzz beforzzz I getzzzz out!

DON'T PAY NO ATTENTION TO THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN, and don't worry about a company that has a STOP rating on the pink sheets after it has been trading out of being a shell for 2 months and has gone from .03 to .001 on a few zillion shares of mostly ignorant investors like me.

The only bashing going on here is the truth.

jmo,
Loofman
icon url

Sola Fide

03/04/08 1:55 PM

#3546 RE: Lex_Luthor #3539

Unfortunately, you make a good point...the Chart is / does exhibit the Most transparent factor.
Precisely, I imagine why there are a few anxious shareholders...if you just got in here in the low teens..you may not be anxious. However, there are many more who bought in somewhat before you...they have reason and right to be anxious.

I can say from my perspective that if I had a client that scheduled a meeting with my company...something They set up and they were a "no show"....and did Not have the professional courtesy to call me after the fact (dead silence) and advise us accordingly of the issue and rescheduling.

It would not matter so much whether they had a valid reason or not, we would be hard pressed to want to do business with them again.
**It is a professional courtesy issue. In this case the company has shareholders money....they Are Under Obligation to their shareholders.
I suspect not all shareholders are willing to be doormats and continue handing their $$'s over blindly.