sanddollar...let's be realistic! First off, I wouldn't have lied about what my name is, so what are the odds they would have let me on the air to start with?
They know I would have asked some uncomfortable questions about certain business practices. One particular question would have been about those 500,000 PP shares Dawn got for 10 cents a share while other PP investors were paying as much as $3.25 right around the same time period. I would also like to know why the restrictions were lifted on those shares.
My second question would have been about the loan they received from Mr. Brumfield. I have to wonder how a $180,000 loan warrants a repayment of $260,000 in a years time! Even worse was the agreement that was made to give him well over 2 million shares (4% of the company) at around 7.6 cents per share to repay said loan. We now have a private investor who owns approx. 13% of the company!
Either Mr. Brumfield is one savy business man or MP's sense of business leaves a lot to be desired, or both. Of course their could be a number of other reasons the deal worked out like it did. Plain & simple, shareholders deserve and should want an explaination!
In any case, I feel pretty sure they wouldn't have taken my call. And, if they did, I doubt I'd have received an answer. More likely I would have been treated like elmo was treated when he called in on a CC a while back.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
