Replies to post #1430 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[W3Research]

One Big Question, NEOM Lawsuits against ...

These other Companies such as Bango (Spot Code) and Next Code for them not using the NEOM Bridge?

Also, what about the Nokia RFID Phone that was just announced, will NEOM have to launch a Lawsuit against them too? The NEOM Patents and IP were supposed to protect us on RFID physical to Internet world linking ... right?

I see all of this going on around us and besides one rather mild PR NEOM ... nothing of real value.

No International Press, No Contracts, No Partners ... nothing.

Someone please explain to me WHEN is NEOM going to get noticed and more importantly ... compensated for this BRIDGE we all hear so much about?

[W3Research]

Retired, help me with this example ...

1.
Nokia builds a Cell/Camera/RFID Phone that reads RFID tags.

2.
NEOM says that they own a BRIDGE that every company that wants to link the physical world of Bar Codes-RFID tags has to cross to link this physical world to the virtual world of the Internet.

3.
Question ...
When does Nokia have to make use of the NEOM Patents and/or IP in any way shape or form for this device to access Interent Data that reads RFIDS?

This is a basic concern here ... if Nokia can do this very basic thing ... then were is NEOM?

After all, did we not say the NEOM Patents covered RFID as well as Bar Codes?

I ask this for very good reason ... have you all seen the High Energy Magic "Spot Codes"

http://www.highenergymagic.com/spotcode/

You had better look here also ... as well as my question on Nokia RFID Phones.

The more I try and nail this down, it seams as if the farther and farther it gets away sometimes.

[RetiredandPlaying]

Smartbiz: You are correct. Its all good for Neom. The patents for Nextcode are on the ability to read the code, but not crossing the bridge. Search their patents and you won't even see the word Internet come up.

Paperclick is, at the moment, just working with their Paperclick codes and (regular barcodes which are still universally used). I said at the moment because voice and RFID are coming. It will be easier for cell manufactures to compete with Nokia in making the macro lens, than for Nextcode to change the entire barcode system to Nextcodes. Remember that barcodes have been used for many years and everybody has programs written for them. You think every bar code on every product in the world will change over...no.

If there is going to be some universal changes, it will be through RFID ;>).

Neom could license from Nextcode/Spotcode for their tech and they can license from Neom for the bridge. But, when the better phones are available, Neom won't need to license.

Like I said, its all good for Neom. The concept of making mobile camera phones into mini computers is creating a very big space for Neom. I think a settlement with Virgin or a license from a big boy will happen before Paperclick gets into full swing. That's what will move up the pps to new OTCBB highs this year. Paperlick is the icing on the licensing cake! But it would be bad business for Neom not to keep themselves busy by promoting Paperclick and asserting themselves into the space. They are doing just that right now at CeBIT and CTIA!

Neom doesn't want to be vulnerable again financially and CSI and initial Paperclick revenue will help until the big deals start coming in.

I'm still looking for a deal to be announced with Dupont and another generated from UVerify/SST/Ron Parsons.
Remember, for end users in the commercial industries, they will buy the Nokia just for doing one task with Paperclick.

All the best. (JP were you the first to use that phrase? I like it.)