InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Aiming4

02/05/08 12:58 PM

#15238 RE: gfp927z #15237

Gfp - we can say it was oversold in hindsite.

Is it still oversold at .90 is the real time question.
icon url

asuhowe

02/05/08 12:59 PM

#15239 RE: gfp927z #15237

gfp,
I think we all could aggree COR was way oversold, but, we needed some NEW money to flow before it was going to start upwards again.. word of mouth can really move a stock like COR.. let's hope that there's really something brewing here, and the last days of runup is providing a nice launching pad, and not a PLANK to walk off of again ;)
icon url

food4thought

02/05/08 1:07 PM

#15240 RE: gfp927z #15237

Certainly it was due for a rebound but not of this nature. Even a valuation argument does not explain this steady diet of daily increases. There is something up here and I'm beginning to feel a bit warm and fuzzy inside. Action like this, as I mentioned, usually holds merit. Let's just hope it is not hype. If Stoll had something up his sleeve and was able to refrain from public enthusiasm I will rebut all bad things I've mumbled about him over the last year. His purchases still confuse me however, so small in nature and can be scrutinized if he is aware of info that would require public disclosure. Either way, seeing my portfolio of late is like falling in love with a stripper . It's exciting until you take her outside and get a good look at her.
icon url

corwatcher

02/05/08 2:49 PM

#15248 RE: gfp927z #15237

"Either way, the stock was way oversold at .50-60 cents, so it was due for a rebound."

I agree. I picked up an additional 47.5k shares in December between 48 and 56 cents. I thought you were currently out of Cortex, but you must have gotten back in if you thought it was due a rebound. Now I am only 60 cents from being back in the black instead of 1.80.

Good luck.