Tech, thanks for the analysis.
Honestly, I didn't read much of the article, as I didn't think that it was really a problem, per se.
What was of interest to me in the article was this line:
"A second-phase is envisioned for the project, but Layte-Liston said, although it's difficult to say, most likely fine particulate emissions would not increase."
It's my hope that the pelletized class A biosolids are burned in conjunction with the MPB killed wood some day. This, I thought, could be the envisioned second-phase of the project.