Replies to post #906 on The Transparent Flamingo

[rrufff]

Isn't that the TA that Anniebonny used to claim that stocks are scams? Looks like you were on it way before her.

ROFLMAO

That's why I've dubbed here Amateur Anniebonny, aka cindyyahoo, multiple booted alias and voyeur extraordinaire.

[rrufff]

Anniebonny likes to read your boards so here goes. (hehehe)

Amateur Anniebonny is no longer a member of IHub so some notes about her MO are not violative of TOU. Note she doesn't cite my posts but merely makes untrue statements and out of context insinations. I didn't defend AURC or claim it was anything other than a extremely speculative leap of faith and that I personally was playing the odds, nothing more, nothing less. In fact, I was kicked off as moderator when I refused to go along with the deletion of negative posts. I continued long, but, again, totally knowing the extremely high likelihood of failure and attempting to capture the gain if things turned out to be as portrayed by the company. Does this make someone a stock tout?

I did go after her and claim that her style was to attack a stock because certain posters posted positively. Then she posts about posters because of the fact they posted about the stocks. With respect to the transfer agent, she claimed the company was a scam because it used a particular TA. That's evidence but not enough to prove anything. I didn't say it wasn't a scam. I just pointed out the weakness and amateur status of her argument.

She made a big deal about CSHD. Most took a look at it and saw the scam immediately. They were claiming to colonize the moon. Any rationale speculator ran away quickly in my opinion. She made a career of stating the obvious. Geez, some of us can see that something is a scam when they claim to be going to colonize the moon or have billions of dollars in bonds. Talk about "patting on the back" for finding the obvious. The sun will come up tomorrow. It's nice to breathe air. What a genius LOL.....

She gets booted off most boards because of her style. I have no problem with those who claim something is a scam. She is a moron, quite frankly, because she claims that a stock is a scam because of its posters and that the posters are touts because of the stock. Circuitous, lazy and quite amateur is Anniebonny.

So kind of gossip upon gossip and then she pizzes, whines and moans when her arguments are refuted. After that she hides on a board that almost nobody sees and calls names and defames posters for posting opinions.

That's her style when you look at her posts.