Replies to post #55743 on Intel Corp (INTC)

[Sarmad]

>> And finally, the article is indeed dated Jan. 4th, 2007. I think the headline is wrong, and nothing should be read into this year-old article.

Thanks for pointing out a possible error by me.

My point is still that the article is wrong in some significant ways, and there is no point is parsing every word in it, because in the end nothing will be learned, except that the contradictory information in the article does not explain the sell-off that occurred last week.