InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

talkinhancock

01/08/08 3:28 PM

#35418 RE: chuck44l #35352

Chuck, forgive my tardiness in responding to you. I don't get a lot of time to check the boards, but I remain very interested in the fate of ACMG investors.
Thanks for your kind note. It was unexpected.
Contrary to many of the caustic sentiments and nefarious intentions attributed to me and my colleagues at Market News First on this board, we at MN1 never intended to undermine Dr. Cavasin or ACMG.
We simply smelled a rat, and the rat now stinks to high heaven.
The primary reason for MN1's creation was to provide investors on the pinks and OTCBB with news and information that the companies in question were not obligated by law to provide. Our commentary in that regard was very much like any talk radio or TV format--we call 'em like we see 'em when they come across the plate.
My friend and colleague Bob Leonard was more harmed by the vitriolic attacks on me than I was, having climbed on the boards to defend me many times. I simply accepted it as the price you pay for going out on a limb when something just doesn't seem right.
The interview blow-off after ACMG promoted it?
The sale to Siam Renewable Energy?
Cavasin appointed to COO?
The investors' dividend?
E-mails promising to appear in the future?
And then, not a word.
Please, ACMG investors, tell me which part of this makes sense to you?
I and my colleagues are simply broadcasters, and a recurring theme in the news business is, particularly among brokers, "If you've never seen it before, something must be wrong."
That argument has been made countless times regarding Hillary Clinton's cattle commodities windfall.
So, as 2008 begins, many of you may wish there were still an entity like Market News First; somewhere you could go at the click of a mouse to know better where your hard earned money was going, and to whom. I hope that such an entity will someday come back. You, as investors, deresrve it.
With no anymosity and no regets,
Rich Hancock