hehehehe
1. I waited 29 minutes for you to respond to my post. I once waited 24 hours for a response. With certain individuals I have a policy of giving them as much time as they need to respond because I know they are *busy*. So he waited 17 minutes and then posted 22 times in 32 minutes as an answer to having his harrassment deleted by the board moderator. His first post was Off Topic and probably should have been sent in PM if his intention was to resolve the issue between he and she. All subsequent posts were repeats (spam) and in violation of the TOU.
2. Your response merely repeated the theme stated in your first attempt at an argument. Repetition seems to be a recurring theme here (pun intented). In light of that I'll refer you to point number one for the answer to your question.
3. OK, let me rephrase. The desired response was not expected to be delivered, the sole purpose was to disrupt the thread, and that *is* in the TOU. Hey, this repeating stuff is kind of fun!
4. I doubt you'll get a different answer. The rules are clear, harrassment is a no no. Except on the Parking Lot.
5. If your last statement is true, then *your* sole purpose here is to support the disruption of threads here at IH, or to effect that disruption yourself. Why you want to do this is unknown.
The rules are clear, harrassment is not acceptable at IH. Harrassment is defined by the moderators and either verified or rejected by Matt. Matt also decides when someone needs a little time in the *cooler* to understand this concept.
thank you for playing
The Bird of Prey
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
