InvestorsHub Logo

maddogs

12/12/07 11:47 AM

#14368 RE: onco_investor #14364

We're not actually doing "ablation", tumer site or not.
Fwiw, any tumer disturbance is historicly a bad thing, assuming the tumer is cancerous. We want to do resects, more like isolating any area to be removed, then removing the problem area.

Much examination of the basis for that FDA warning would need to be examined before I would assume RF at fault, rather than the mechanics of the procedure itsself.

emilson

12/12/07 11:54 AM

#14373 RE: onco_investor #14364

This could be other processes that are in use that the Dr. is in control and usually burns the tissue. Our machine is in control of the heat process. But it looks like some of these Dr.s have taken it upon themselves to experment on their own without FDA approval. Maybe they are taking a good look at our product.

mikethespike

12/12/07 11:56 AM

#14374 RE: onco_investor #14364

Thanks for the very important post! I do not know what this means. I will say I don't like the timing of it! I hope they are talking about those inferior older devices from the big boys. We have never done anything in the USA, so I believe this may be positive for us in a masked statement. New, and improved device.