InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

f1fans

12/10/07 10:27 PM

#94425 RE: clarity789 #94423

Janice beat you to it,but thank you any way for the longer answer.
icon url

coinsguy

12/11/07 6:08 AM

#94437 RE: clarity789 #94423

I find it difficult to believe that there are 200 people who countersued Megas. There are not even that many that consistently read this board, or the RB board, combined. Furthermore, most of the 1500 shareholders either could not afford a lawyer, or would not have found it cost effective to spend $500 or more to hire one, in order to represent them. While 14 may well be to small, I beleive 200 is a gross over inflation of the number designed to impress and nothing more. Who provided the figure of 200?
icon url

coinsguy

12/11/07 6:17 AM

#94439 RE: clarity789 #94423

clarity789, what do you mean your name is not there? Do you mean as replying via an attorney rather than yourself?
icon url

ptcgolf

12/11/07 8:46 AM

#94442 RE: clarity789 #94423

Well lets make sure we distinguish here...There are two groups of individuals with attorneys. Those of us who thought is was in our best interest to have legal representation, through the lawsuit and could afford it. Then there is the handful of individual's, with attorneys, who filed a counter suit against BCIT.

Now who is being loose with their facts?