InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mnvestor

12/03/07 1:52 PM

#8488 RE: Uncle Meatball #8484

That's the problem with pinks...
PR could have been a smokescreen protected by safe harbor clause...IMO only
icon url

BuckeyeMike

12/03/07 1:54 PM

#8491 RE: Uncle Meatball #8484

I just got off the phone with Peter 3 minutes ago...

There is NO Dilution IMO going on.
icon url

thunderttt

12/03/07 1:54 PM

#8493 RE: Uncle Meatball #8484

We are bag holders of a POS, everyone knows it. I thinks it best to send letter's to the dealer's they are claiming to do bus with. You want to buy a product from a scam. Not me.
icon url

W3Research

12/03/07 1:54 PM

#8494 RE: Uncle Meatball #8484

Uncle Meatball, Mr. C needs to PR and quick!
icon url

LOL

12/03/07 2:00 PM

#8507 RE: Uncle Meatball #8484

Look at my past posts, I've seen this done at least a half dozen times. The company buys back a joke of an amount of shares, and creates investor confidence, then dumps their ass off a minute later, and everyone goes, well why did they buy back the shares only to dump a minute later, that doesn't make sense, exactly, that's what the rational mind says, and that's how the crooked mind takes advantage. This has stunk to high heaven the minute "the pr is coming, the pr is coming" started, and then when that lame buyback occured the writing was on the wall, not to mention the HUGE pr that was first promised 2 weeks ago, but was postponed because of rain(LOL) has yet to show up, and keeps getting pushed back. I hate when I'm right about these scams, because it means I didn't make as much money as I thought I would. Oh and lets not forget Vant said the insiders told him no dillution until next year, they must have meant next fiscal year.IMO